Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, plist fixes

On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> i think it would be handy to resurrect ALL_TASKS_PI. It was one of the 
> things that stabilized the sorted list approach so quickly. Nothing 
> beats the coverage of running a full graphical desktop with all the PI 
> code active :-)


I keep wondering why I'm dragging ALL_TASKS_PI around in all my patches,
since it doesn't work. Why not have it on all the time?

Daniel 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, plist fixes
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: IRQ exception upon networking with many vifs/bridges (using Xen)
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, plist fixes
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, plist fixes
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, plist fixes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]