* Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > but i think the fundamental question remains even on Sunday mornings -
> > is the plist overhead worth it? Compared to the simple sorted list we
> > exchange O(nr_RT_tasks_running) for O(nr_RT_levels_used) [which is in
> > the 1-100 range], is that a significant practical improvement? By
> > overhead i dont just mean cycle cost, but also architectural flexibility
> > and maintainability.
>
> That was my question too.
i think it would be handy to resurrect ALL_TASKS_PI. It was one of the
things that stabilized the sorted list approach so quickly. Nothing
beats the coverage of running a full graphical desktop with all the PI
code active :-)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
