Re: patch] Real-Time Preemption, plist fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Esben Nielsen <[email protected]> wrote:

> When K is a constant or bounded by a constant (140 in this 
> application) any function which is O(K) is O(1) per definition of O!

technically you are right. But the question is - while K is considered a 
constant, and N (nr_running_RT_tasks) is technically not bounded - in 
practice N is bounded just as much. Have you ever seen any hard-RT 
application that has more than 140 threads _running at the same time_ on 
a single CPU? You can even enforce it to be theoretically bounded, via 
ulimits.

in fact, K and N should be pretty close to each other for most 
applications. I'd be interested in real application scenarios where N is 
much (== more than 10 times) larger than K and plists really matter.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux