Hello, On 03 Jun 2005, Lukasz Stelmach wrote: > That is why i suggested seting R-T as > Reply-To: Real Name <linux-kernel@...> [...] > 1. No duplicate messages running through the net. [1] > 2. Personal messages are easy distinguishible. > 3. Unsubscribers can receive answers. You seem not to understand. The points you list are just attempts to make things easier which do work and are quite easy already. You forget (or ignore) that Reply-To:-Munging *breaks* things that currently work. Please stop this discussion, it leads to nothing. So long, Jochen. -- It's really hard to write docs for people who cannot read... [Michael Shalayeff on [email protected]]
Attachment:
pgpPKfIMVOqkn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: [OT] mailing list management
- From: Keith Owens <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] mailing list management
- From: Lukasz Stelmach <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] mailing list management
- Prev by Date: swsusp, preempt, input and 2.6.12-rc5-mm2 Re: swsusp not working for me on a PREEMPT 2.6.12-rc1 and 2.6.12-rc1-mm3 kernel
- Next by Date: Re: Suggestion on "int len" sanity
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] mailing list management
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] mailing list management
- Index(es):