Keith Owens napisał(a): > On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:49:08 +0100, > Paulo Marques <[email protected]> wrote: >>The thing is, this list has a lot of traffic (as you might have noticed >>:), and sometimes people don't have time to go through all the emails, >>and just take special attention at mails directed at them personally. > > > "There is always more than one way to do things". Yes I like perl. > ~/.procmailrc [...] That is why i suggested seting R-T as Reply-To: Real Name <linux-kernel@...> Then one replies To: Real Name <linux-kernel@...> and it is even easier to find personal (that is how fidonet echos work what mailing lists and usenet groups lack). For unsubscribers there is Cc header and a rule that *we* shoud use "reply all" operation rather than "reply". 1. No duplicate messages running through the net. [1] 2. Personal messages are easy distinguishible. 3. Unsubscribers can receive answers. And what if R-T is completly removed from e-mails sent to the subscirbers? [1] If you send a CCed message *you* send it several times to the server and it is *your* connection which gets overloaded first. Best regards. -- Było mi bardzo miło. Trzecia pospolita klęska, [...] >Łukasz< Już nie katolicka lecz złodziejska. (c)PP
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT] mailing list management
- From: Jochen Striepe <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] mailing list management
- References:
- Re: [OT] mailing list management
- From: Keith Owens <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] mailing list management
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Kdump: Disabling PCI interrupts in capture kernel
- Next by Date: Re: Suggestion on "int len" sanity
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] mailing list management
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] mailing list management
- Index(es):