How much is this like ethernet? does it still do ARP?
Can it do promiscious receive?
> +LIST_HEAD(rionet_peers);
Does this have to be global?
Not sure about the locking of this stuff, are you
relying on the RTNL?
> +
> +static int rionet_change_mtu(struct net_device *ndev, int new_mtu)
> +{
> + struct rionet_private *rnet = ndev->priv;
> +
> + if (netif_msg_drv(rnet))
> + printk(KERN_WARNING
> + "%s: rionet_change_mtu(): not implemented\n", DRV_NAME);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
If you can allow any mtu then don't need this at all.
Or if you are limited then better return an error for bad values.
> +static void rionet_set_multicast_list(struct net_device *ndev)
> +{
> + struct rionet_private *rnet = ndev->priv;
> +
> + if (netif_msg_drv(rnet))
> + printk(KERN_WARNING
> + "%s: rionet_set_multicast_list(): not implemented\n",
> + DRV_NAME);
> +}
If you can't handle it then just leave dev->set_multicast_list
as NULL and all attempts to add or delete will get -EINVAL
> +
> +static int rionet_open(struct net_device *ndev)
> +{
> + /* Initialize inbound message ring */
> + for (i = 0; i < RIONET_RX_RING_SIZE; i++)
> + rnet->rx_skb[i] = NULL;
> + rnet->rx_slot = 0;
> + rionet_rx_fill(ndev, 0);
> +
> + rnet->tx_slot = 0;
> + rnet->tx_cnt = 0;
> + rnet->ack_slot = 0;
> +
> + spin_lock_init(&rnet->lock);
> +
> + rnet->msg_enable = RIONET_DEFAULT_MSGLEVEL;
Better to do all initialization of the per device data
in the place it is allocated (rio_setup_netdev)
> +
> +static int rionet_ioctl(struct net_device *ndev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd)
> +{
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
Unneeded, if dev->do_ioctl is NULL, then all private ioctl's will
return -EINVAL that is what you want.
> +
> +static u32 rionet_get_link(struct net_device *ndev)
> +{
> + return netif_carrier_ok(ndev);
> +}
Use ethtool_op_get_link
> +
> +static int rionet_setup_netdev(struct rio_mport *mport)
> +{
> + int rc = 0;
> + struct net_device *ndev = NULL;
> + struct rionet_private *rnet;
> + u16 device_id;
> +
> + /* Allocate our net_device structure */
> + ndev = alloc_etherdev(sizeof(struct rionet_private));
> + if (ndev == NULL) {
> + printk(KERN_INFO "%s: could not allocate ethernet device.\n",
> + DRV_NAME);
> + rc = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * XXX hack, store point a static at ndev so we can get it...
> + * Perhaps need an array of these that the handler can
> + * index via the mbox number.
> + */
> + sndev = ndev;
> +
> + /* Set up private area */
> + rnet = (struct rionet_private *)ndev->priv;
> + rnet->mport = mport;
> +
> + /* Set the default MAC address */
> + device_id = rio_local_get_device_id(mport);
> + ndev->dev_addr[0] = 0x00;
> + ndev->dev_addr[1] = 0x01;
> + ndev->dev_addr[2] = 0x00;
> + ndev->dev_addr[3] = 0x01;
> + ndev->dev_addr[4] = device_id >> 8;
> + ndev->dev_addr[5] = device_id & 0xff;
> +
> + /* Fill in the driver function table */
> + ndev->open = &rionet_open;
> + ndev->hard_start_xmit = &rionet_start_xmit;
> + ndev->stop = &rionet_close;
> + ndev->get_stats = &rionet_stats;
> + ndev->change_mtu = &rionet_change_mtu;
> + ndev->set_mac_address = &rionet_set_mac_address;
> + ndev->set_multicast_list = &rionet_set_multicast_list;
> + ndev->do_ioctl = &rionet_ioctl;
> + SET_ETHTOOL_OPS(ndev, &rionet_ethtool_ops);
> +
> + ndev->mtu = RIO_MAX_MSG_SIZE - 14;
> +
> + SET_MODULE_OWNER(ndev);
Can you set any ndev->features to get better performance.
Can you take >32bit data addresses? then set HIGHDMA
You are doing your on locking, can you use LLTX?
Does the hardware support scatter gather?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]