Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Michal Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:Are you sure this is the right .config?yes - just enable LATENCY_TRACE, that's what i used for testing.
OK, did that, init segfaults. I guess I really have to try a different gcc version. Maybe binutils too.
Michal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- RT patch breaks X86_64 build
- From: Parag Warudkar <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch breaks X86_64 build
- From: Parag Warudkar <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch breaks X86_64 build
- From: Michal Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch breaks X86_64 build
- From: Parag Warudkar <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch breaks X86_64 build
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch breaks X86_64 build
- From: Michal Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch breaks X86_64 build
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch breaks X86_64 build
- From: Michal Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch breaks X86_64 build
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- RT patch breaks X86_64 build
- Prev by Date: Re: [rfc] [patch] consolidate/clean up spinlock.h files
- Next by Date: Did anyone try (Logitech/Microsoft) bluetooth keyboard and mouse on Linux?
- Previous by thread: Re: RT patch breaks X86_64 build
- Next by thread: Re: RT patch breaks X86_64 build
- Index(es):
 |