Re: RT patch breaks X86_64 build

* Michal Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:

> Parag Warudkar wrote:
> >  CC      kernel/latency.o
> >kernel/latency.c:854: error: `NR_syscalls' undeclared here (not in a 
> >function)
> >
> >x86_64 doesn't seem to be defining NR_syscalls anywhere.. Shouldn't it be 
> >part of unistd.h as other arches do?
> 
> I noticed that error too. AFAIK this is not a new error in -RT, 
> latency.o never compiled on x86_64 for me. For now just disable 
> Latency tracing (CONFIG_LATENCY_TRACE).

indeed it was broken - i fixed x64 LATENCY_TRACE in the -47-16 kernel.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RT patch breaks X86_64 build
    • From: Michal Schmidt <[email protected]>
  • Re: RT patch breaks X86_64 build
    • From: Michal Schmidt <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RT patch breaks X86_64 build
    • From: Parag Warudkar <[email protected]>
  • Re: RT patch breaks X86_64 build
    • From: Parag Warudkar <[email protected]>
  • Re: RT patch breaks X86_64 build
    • From: Michal Schmidt <[email protected]>
  • Re: RT patch breaks X86_64 build
    • From: Parag Warudkar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] add page_state info to show_mem
• Next by Date: Re: Tyan Opteron boards and problems with parallel ports (badpmd)
• Previous by thread: Re: RT patch breaks X86_64 build
• Next by thread: Re: RT patch breaks X86_64 build
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]