On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 09:34, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Funny you should mention this. Check the latest -mm code and you'll see Andrew
> has merged my smp nice code which takes into account "nice" values and alters
> balancing according to nice values and heavily biases them when real time
> tasks are running. So you are correct, and it is a problem common to any
> per-cpu runqueue designed scheduler (which interestingly there is evidence
> that windows went to in about 2003 because it exhibited this very problem).
> However my code should make this behave better now.
>
Glad to hear this is in --mm! And BTW, your patch works great with my
HT test case. Thanks -- good job.
--
Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
