Re: RT patch acceptance

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 04:59:32PM -0700, Bill Huey wrote:
> They still all have to interact with each other in a temporarly protected
> way so that latency is propagated through each RT domain (soft, hard, none)
> in the app.

Sorry, is "not" propagated through those domains by accident.

bill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: RT patch acceptance
  - From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
  - From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
  - From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
  - From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
  - From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
  - From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
  - From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
  - From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
  - From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: RT patch acceptance
  - From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Avoiding external fragmentation with a placement policy Version 12
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Abstracted Priority Inheritance for RT
Previous by thread: Re: RT patch acceptance
Next by thread: Re: RT patch acceptance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]