Re: RT patch acceptance

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 04:59:32PM -0700, Bill Huey wrote:
> They still all have to interact with each other in a temporarly protected
> way so that latency is propagated through each RT domain (soft, hard, none)
> in the app.

Sorry, is "not" propagated through those domains by accident.

bill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: RT patch acceptance
    • From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
  • Re: RT patch acceptance
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: RT patch acceptance
    • From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
  • Re: RT patch acceptance
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: RT patch acceptance
    • From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
  • Re: RT patch acceptance
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: RT patch acceptance
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: RT patch acceptance
    • From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
  • Re: RT patch acceptance
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: RT patch acceptance
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Avoiding external fragmentation with a placement policy Version 12
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Abstracted Priority Inheritance for RT
• Previous by thread: Re: RT patch acceptance
• Next by thread: Re: RT patch acceptance
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]