On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 04:02:44PM -0700, Bill Huey wrote:
> This is not the purpose of the patch, nor will it ever be. RT apps don't
> depend on this property as was previously mentioned in this thread.
...
> Again, this has been covered previously by this thread. It's ultimately
> about writing RT apps that have a more sophisticated use that RTAI or
> RT Linux.
Andrea,
I mean those above comments to be hard RT.
I do mention a syscall use and expression of these RT properties, but it's
really not hard RT but something else closer to soft RT threads. I blew
it by using the wrong definition there.
They still all have to interact with each other in a temporarly protected
way so that latency is propagated through each RT domain (soft, hard, none)
in the app.
bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
