On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 10:56:07PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> I have no permission from the customer who actually payed the survey to
> publish the results yet. But I continue asking for it.
Ok, thanks for asking ;)
> I have a slightly outdated patch with that around on top of RT, but it
> introduces yet another level of ugliness.
> You must carefully identify the places where you really need the
> hard_local_irq_dis/enable(). It's not hard though.
>
> I used it in the early days of PREEMPT_RT to identify the IRQ off
> sections and some other deadlocking scenarios. I kept this always as an
> option for adding on top of Ingos implementation to close the gap to
> "ruby".
I see.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
