On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 11:33:07AM -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> in a wider context of all the other statements within that claim, the main
> part being what I quoted earlier.
Ok great, I trust your patent knowledge given your background ;).
It's very reassuring that I was wrong and preempt-rt is not covered by
the patent. Until now I really understood that redefining an hard irq
disable to a soft irq disable was forbidden at large.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
