Hello,
> This was brought up earlier at http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/5/6/30
>
> Is there any reason for this one-liner to not go into mainline? It
> appears to fix up a quite nasty failure. Even if it is not the real
> correct long term solution it has to be better than having boxes
> panic'ing under certain loads?
Actually I just wanted to write Andrew to include the two one-liners
that fix the real bugs (the patches will follow soon). I have the bigger
patch splitting the checkpoint lists but that is certainly not a 2.6.12
thing. And this bigger patch needs the two one-line fixes anyway.
I'll elaborate more in the mails with the patches...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SuSE CR Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
