Assertion failure in log_do_checkpoint() and the fix

This was brought up earlier at http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/5/6/30

Is there any reason for this one-liner to not go into mainline? It
appears to fix up a quite nasty failure. Even if it is not the real
correct long term solution it has to be better than having boxes
panic'ing under certain loads?

I'm clueless about this but it does appear to fix my bug and others have
hit this aswell. (apologies if this has been fixed in another way,
haven't seen any jbd/ext3 patches in a while)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Assertion failure in log_do_checkpoint() and the fix
    • From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] Add offset.h to dontdiff
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] x86-64: Use SSE for copy_page and clear_page
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] Add offset.h to dontdiff
• Next by thread: Re: Assertion failure in log_do_checkpoint() and the fix
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]