On Tue, 31 May 2005 19:28:59 +0200 Jesper Juhl wrote:
| On 5/31/05, Roman Zippel <[email protected]> wrote:
| > Hi,
| >
| > On Tue, 31 May 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
| >
| > > there's still the point that it's currently used inconsistently.
| >
| > Why is it so important to fix this "inconsistency"?
| > Why is it so difficult to accept that both are valid options?
| >
|
| Let's just let this patch die quietly, ok?
|
| It's not important, I just made it one late evening and submitted it
| in case it was wanted. It was not wanted so it should just die. No
| difficulty accepting that.
I second that.
Thanks.
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
