On 5/31/05, Roman Zippel <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 31 May 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > there's still the point that it's currently used inconsistently.
>
> Why is it so important to fix this "inconsistency"?
> Why is it so difficult to accept that both are valid options?
>
Let's just let this patch die quietly, ok?
It's not important, I just made it one late evening and submitted it
in case it was wanted. It was not wanted so it should just die. No
difficulty accepting that.
--
Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
