On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 18:51 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Hmm.. Should there be a pair of {}'s somewhere?
Only if it were actual code for the tree, rather than a throw away
test ... it's a single lun target, so the condition is always true.
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Grégoire Favre <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Grégoire Favre <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Grégoire Favre <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Grégoire Favre <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Grégoire Favre <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Grégoire Favre <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Michael Tokarev <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Possible GPL Violation
- Next by Date: vm-issues in 2.6.12-rc5
- Previous by thread: Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- Next by thread: Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- Index(es):
 |