On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 17:39 +0200, Grégoire Favre wrote:
> target1:0:1: FAST-20 SCSI 20.0 MB/s ST (50 ns, offset 15)
>
> target1:0:1: Domain Validation detected failure, dropping back
>
> I hope it could be useful, now that my "toolchain" to fetch log is on,
> don't hesitate to ask me to try things...
Actually, did you capture anything more after this?
There's an indication from a previous file you sent:
Target 1 Negotiation Settings
User: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 127)
Goal: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15)
Curr: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15)
That for some reason the bus is tied to 10MHz (i.e. fast but not ultra).
The DV began at Ultra, but it should next drop down to FAST.
Also, when it finally boots up what does
/sys/class/spi_transport/target1:0:1/min_period
contain?
Thanks,
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Grégoire Favre <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- References:
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Dinakar Guniguntala <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Grégoire Favre <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Grégoire Favre <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Grégoire Favre <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- From: Grégoire Favre <[email protected]>
- Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch] smp_processor_id() cleanup, 2.6.12-rc5
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] fs/mm: execute in place (3rd version)
- Previous by thread: Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- Next by thread: Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- Index(es):
 |