Matthias Andree wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2005, Jens Axboe wrote:
suck and should not be cared about, and if I were to go into SATA, I
should just get a new controller and forget about my onboard VIA crap.
(I read newer VIA are supposed to support AHCI which is good.)
SATA is still pretty fast without NCQ, it just makes some operations a
Do I take this as SATA is faster than legacy ATA? In what respect?
UDMA/33 and SATA I shouldn't be much different if I use the same drive,
or is there something?
It is "likely" to be faster. Faster bus, newer technology.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
