Re: Playing with SATA NCQ

[Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>]

I also saw a good boost from NCQ on the qstor driver (full version,
not the libata subset) last year.  Very good for busy servers
and RAID arrays.

Jens Axboe wrote:
+	do {
+		/*
+		 * we rely on the FIFO order of the exclusive waitqueues
+		 */
+		prepare_to_wait_exclusive(&ap->cmd_wait_queue, &wait,
+					  TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+
+		if (!ata_qc_issue_ok(ap, qc, 1)) {
+			spin_unlock_irq(&ap->host_set->lock);
+			schedule();
+			spin_lock_irq(&ap->host_set->lock);
+		}
+
+		finish_wait(&ap->cmd_wait_queue, &wait);
+
+	} while (!ata_qc_issue_ok(ap, qc, 1));

In this bit (above), is it possible for this code to ever
be invoked from a SCHED_RR or SCHED_FIFO context?

If so, it will lock out all lower-priority processes
for the duration of the polling interval.

Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/