Suparna Bhattacharya wrote: > To get a complete picture, how did you want to handle direct io ? > >Regards >Suparna > > Just through the regular xip path, O_DIRECT doesn't have any effect on those files since we do a direct memcpy to disk in the end anyway. That has the user-visible effect that unalligned reads/writes work with O_DIRECT. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] fs/mm: execute in place (3rd version)
- From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] fs/mm: execute in place (3rd version)
- References:
- [RFC/PATCH 2/4] fs/mm: execute in place (3rd version)
- From: Carsten Otte <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] fs/mm: execute in place (3rd version)
- From: Suparna Bhattacharya <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] fs/mm: execute in place (3rd version)
- From: Carsten Otte <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] fs/mm: execute in place (3rd version)
- From: Suparna Bhattacharya <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] fs/mm: execute in place (3rd version)
- From: Carsten Otte <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] fs/mm: execute in place (3rd version)
- From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] fs/mm: execute in place (3rd version)
- From: Suparna Bhattacharya <[email protected]>
- [RFC/PATCH 2/4] fs/mm: execute in place (3rd version)
- Prev by Date: Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] fs/mm: execute in place (3rd version)
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] fs/mm: execute in place (3rd version)
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] fs/mm: execute in place (3rd version)
- Index(es):