On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 08:58:55PM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 08:45:36AM -0700, Rajesh Shah wrote:
> > The concern here isn't just increasing the size of pci_bus. The
> > resource pointers in pci_bus point to resource structures in the
> > corresponding pci_dev structure for p2p bridges. If we want to
> > maintain this scheme, we'd have to increase the number of resources
> > in the pci_dev structure too, which increases it for every single
> > pci device in the system.
>
> No. The pci_bus resource pointers are just pointers to _some_ resources
> and generally aren't tied to particular pci device. For example, the
> root pci buses often don't even have corresponding bus->self structure,
> and bus resources are pointers to global io[mem,port]_resource.
For the transparent p2p bridge problem you mentioned, wouldn't you
be dealing with p2p bridges, and therefore expect the pci_bus
resource pointers to point to the corresponding pci_dev resources?
Or are you proposing to decouple pci_bus resource pointers from
pci_dev completely? From quick code inspection, that seems to be
not too much trouble to increase from 4 then.
Rajesh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]