On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 08:45:36AM -0700, Rajesh Shah wrote:
> The concern here isn't just increasing the size of pci_bus. The
> resource pointers in pci_bus point to resource structures in the
> corresponding pci_dev structure for p2p bridges. If we want to
> maintain this scheme, we'd have to increase the number of resources
> in the pci_dev structure too, which increases it for every single
> pci device in the system.
No. The pci_bus resource pointers are just pointers to _some_ resources
and generally aren't tied to particular pci device. For example, the
root pci buses often don't even have corresponding bus->self structure,
and bus resources are pointers to global io[mem,port]_resource.
And definitely we must not touch resource layout in struct pci_dev -
it's defined by pci specs.
> Probably ok for big server machines, but
> would others (e.g. embedded folks) complain?
Increasing the size of pci_bus by 8 or 16 bytes shouldn't be a problem -
I don't think embedded machines have a lot of pci buses. :-)
Anyway, the default PCI_BUS_NUM_RESOURCES value can be overridden in
arch specific headers.
Ivan.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
