> The patch failed rbinds in some cases. Fixed it. The enclosed patch > has a high chance of being bug free. Except not setting mnt_namespace corretly, it does seem to be ok. Miklos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [RFC][PATCH] rbind across namespaces
- From: Ram <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] rbind across namespaces
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] rbind across namespaces
- From: Ram <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] rbind across namespaces
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] rbind across namespaces
- From: Ram <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] rbind across namespaces
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] rbind across namespaces
- From: Ram <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] rbind across namespaces
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] rbind across namespaces
- From: Ram <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] rbind across namespaces
- From: Ram <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH] rbind across namespaces
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] rbind across namespaces
- Next by Date: Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] rbind across namespaces
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] rbind across namespaces
- Index(es):
 |