On Sul, 2005-05-22 at 23:40, Linus Torvalds wrote: > + (d) I understand that the project is public, and that a record is I'd s/a record/a public record/ in the interests of clarity, but see what the lawyers say. Otherwise looks good. Alan "In my paradise the streets are paved with lawyers" Anon. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- Prev by Date: Re: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7
- Next by Date: [DVB patch 0/5] DVB update, mostly dvb-usb
- Previous by thread: Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- Next by thread: Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- Index(es):
 |