On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 09:59 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 08:53 -0400, Peter Staubach wrote:
> > There are certainly many others way to get gathering, without adding an
> > artificial delay. There are already delay slots built into the code
> > which could
> > be used to trigger the gathering, so with a little bit different
> > architecture, the
> > performance increases could be achieved.
> >
> > Some implementations actually do write gathering with NFSv3, even. Is
> > this interesting enough to play with? I suspect that just doing the
> > work for
> > NFSv2 is not...
>
> Also, how do you explain the big performance hit that steve observed?
> Write gathering is supposed to help performance, but it's a big loss on
> his test...
>
that would depend on the NFS client and the application. for example, if
the NFS client has no (or low) concurrency, then write gathering would
reduce preformance.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
