On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 08:53 -0400, Peter Staubach wrote:
> There are certainly many others way to get gathering, without adding an
> artificial delay. There are already delay slots built into the code
> which could
> be used to trigger the gathering, so with a little bit different
> architecture, the
> performance increases could be achieved.
>
> Some implementations actually do write gathering with NFSv3, even. Is
> this interesting enough to play with? I suspect that just doing the
> work for
> NFSv2 is not...
Also, how do you explain the big performance hit that steve observed?
Write gathering is supposed to help performance, but it's a big loss on
his test...
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
