* Lee Revell <[email protected]> [050518 12:06]:
> On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 20:50 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Please don't do this, CONFIG_NO_IDLE_HZ patches are better solution,
> > and they worked okay last time I tried them.
>
> Last time the dynamic tick patches were posted, you reported they worked
> fine. The next question is, when do they get merged?
Uh, I've been meaning to do some clean-up on the x86 patch, but been
distracted every time I've tried... I'll try to do an updated patch
soon... But meanwhile, I believe the dyn-tick patch works reliably
on all machines if DYN_TICK_USE_APIC is not set in Kconfig.
Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
