On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 20:50 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Please don't do this, CONFIG_NO_IDLE_HZ patches are better solution, > and they worked okay last time I tried them. Last time the dynamic tick patches were posted, you reported they worked fine. The next question is, when do they get merged? Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt.
- From: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt.
- References:
- [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt.
- From: christoph <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt.
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt.
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt.
- From: randy_dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt.
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt.
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt.
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt.
- Prev by Date: Re: Illegal use of reserved word in system.h
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix race in mark_mounts_for_expiry()
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt.
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt.
- Index(es):
 |