Re: [PATCH] fix race in mark_mounts_for_expiry()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > 
> > There's still the problem of cmpxchg meddling in the internals of an
> > atomic_t.  Is that OK?  Will that work on all archs?
> 
> Probably. It might be worth defining an atomic_cmpxchg() op to formalise it
> though:
> 
> 	int atomic_cmpxchg(atomic_t *p, int old, int new);
> 
> The main reason for this is that atomic_t is mostly a 32-bit value, I think,
> and cmpxchg() may sometimes enforce a 64-bit value.
> 
> It can be made to work on PPC, PPC64, x86, x86_64, frv. I imagine it'll work
> on MIPS, sparc and alpha too without too much trouble. Dunno about the rest.

Any takers?

I'd rather not do this, if I don't have to :)

Do you think my original fix is wrong, or is this just cosmetics?

Thanks,
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux