On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 13:28 +0300, linux wrote: > ok.i see what u mean. > But should this value on a stable version be 0 again??? why? "the absolute value has no meaning" -> why would "0" be special ??? Answer: It's not. And actually -5 minutes is more useful than 0 because it keeps helping finding bugs... why do you want it to start at 0 ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6 jiffies
- From: Coywolf Qi Hunt <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6 jiffies
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] namespace.c: fix bind mount from foreign namespace
- From: Ram <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] namespace.c: fix bind mount from foreign namespace
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] namespace.c: fix bind mount from foreign namespace
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] namespace.c: fix bind mount from foreign namespace
- From: Ram <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] namespace.c: fix bind mount from foreign namespace
- From: Jamie Lokier <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] namespace.c: fix bind mount from foreign namespace
- From: Ram <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] namespace.c: fix bind mount from foreign namespace
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] namespace.c: fix bind mount from foreign namespace
- From: Jamie Lokier <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] namespace.c: fix bind mount from foreign namespace
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] fix race in mark_mounts_for_expiry()
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- 2.6 jiffies
- From: "linux" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6 jiffies
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6 jiffies
- From: "linux" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] namespace.c: fix bind mount from foreign namespace
- Prev by Date: Re: hostap gone from 2.6.12-rc4-mm2?
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6 jiffies
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6 jiffies
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6 jiffies
- Index(es):
 |