On 04/05/05 12:28 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > A couple of days ago, Matt Mackall described/proposed a tool to > check new patches for acceptable content and format: > http://www.selenic.com/pipermail/kernel-mentors/2005-May/000072.html > > I'm attaching a rudimentary version of such a tool (check-patch.pl). > It does not attempt to check for line wrapping or lines that are > > 80 characters. I made a simpler (it's only regexes :-) ) and uglier version, which does check for line wrapping. I probably won't have too much time to work on it, so feel free to do whatever you want with it. > It dislikes patches that contain attachments that are base64, > quoted-printable, or binary (e.g.). > > People can run this script locally, but ideally We (royal) will > have an email address for it so that people can use it to check > if their mail interface munges the patch for them... :( > and can try again until it doesn't. I put mine on [email protected] ... don't abuse it too much, it's just an old pentium on adsl there :-) Domen
Attachment:
patch-tester.pl
Description: Perl program
- References:
- [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy
- From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy
- From: [email protected]
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy
- From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy
- From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy
- From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy
- Prev by Date: Re: [rfc/patch] libata -- port configurable delays
- Next by Date: Re: [ANNOUNCE] hotplug-ng 002 release
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy
- Index(es):
 |