On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 01:52:33PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote: > > No. > > What part of what I wrote are you saying "No" to? The question right above "No" :) > > And what does that have to do with the two different > locking mechanisms for hotplug? Because lock_cpu_hotplug() isn't a lock just for cpu_online_map. I think we need better in-tree documentation of cpu hotplug locking. For now most of the descriptions are in conversations between Rusty and Vatsa in linux hotplug cpu support mailing list while they were designing it. Thanks Dipankar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- References:
- [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- From: Dinakar Guniguntala <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- From: Nathan Lynch <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- From: Dinakar Guniguntala <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- From: Dipankar Sarma <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- Prev by Date: Re: Y2K-like bug to hit Linux computers! - Info of the day
- Next by Date: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- Previous by thread: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- Next by thread: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- Index(es):