> No.
What part of what I wrote are you saying "No" to?
And what does that have to do with the two different
locking mechanisms for hotplug?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- From: Dipankar Sarma <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- References:
- [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- From: Dinakar Guniguntala <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- From: Nathan Lynch <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- From: Dinakar Guniguntala <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- From: Dipankar Sarma <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] fix radeonfb MAX_MAPPED_VRAM in 2.4.30
- Next by Date: kernel OOPS for XFS in xfs_iget_core (using NFS+SMP+MD)
- Previous by thread: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- Next by thread: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken
- Index(es):
 |