On Fri, 13 May 2005, Andy Isaacson wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 10:32:48AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > http://www.daemonology.net/hyperthreading-considered-harmful/
> >
> > Already read it. This link provides no more information than either of
> > the above links provide.
>
> He's posted his paper now.
>
> http://www.daemonology.net/papers/htt.pdf
>
> It's a side channel timing attack on data-dependent computation through
> the L1 and L2 caches. Nice work. In-the-wild exploitation is
> difficult, though; your timing gets screwed up if you get scheduled away
> from your victim, and you don't even know, because you can't tell where
> you were scheduled, so on any reasonably busy multiuser system it's not
> clear that the attack is practical.
>
> -andy
> -
Wouldn't scheduling appear as a rather big time delta (in measuring the
cache access times), so you would know to disregard that data point?
(Just wondering... :-) )
-Vadim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
