Re: Hyper-Threading Vulnerability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 10:10:36AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:

Barry K. Nathan wrote:

On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 07:51:20AM +0200, Gabor MICSKO wrote:


Is this flaw affects the current stable Linux kernels? Workaround?
Patch?

Simple.  Just boot a uniprocessor kernel, and/or disable HT in BIOS.



Some pages with relevant information:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0403.2/0920.html
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2317

These pages have zero information on the "flaw." In fact, I can see no information at all proving that there is even a problem here.

Classic "I found a problem, but I'm keeping the info a secret" security crapola.


FYI:
  http://www.daemonology.net/hyperthreading-considered-harmful/

Already read it. This link provides no more information than either of the above links provide.


I don't much agree with Colin about the severity of the problem, but
I've read his paper, which should be generally available later today.
It's definitely a legitimate issue.

We'll see...

As of this moment, there continues to be _zero_ information proving that a problem exists.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux