On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 12:59:38PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 06:46:49PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 12:38:51PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 05:36:54AM -0400, Christopher Warner wrote:
> > > > 2.6.11.5 kernel,
> > > > Tyan S2882/dual AMD 246 opterons
> > > > sh:18983: mm/memory.c:99: bad pmd ffff810005974cc8(00007ffffffffe46).
> > > > sh:18983: mm/memory.c:99: bad pmd ffff810005974cd0(00007ffffffffe47).
> > >
> > > That's the 3rd or 4th time I've seen this reported on this hardware.
> > > It's not exclusive to it, but it does seem more susceptible
> > > for some reason. Spooky.
> >
> > It seems to be clear now that it is hardware independent.
> >
> > I actually got it once now too, but only after 24+h stress test :/
> >
> > I have a better debugging patch now that I will be testing soon,
> > hopefully that turns something up.
>
> Ok, I'm respinning the Fedora update kernel today for other
> reasons, if you have that patch in time, I'll toss it in too.
The patch has considerable overhead, probably not good idea
for a production rpm.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
