> Datapoint: exactly the same model as my workstation which showed > this problem recently. FYI Since all the people who run into this are refusing to test my debugging/test patches (no feedback at all for them so far) I give up on this now. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Christopher Warner <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6
- Prev by Date: Re: stuffing characters to keyboard buffer.
- Next by Date: Re: x86-64 dual core mapping
- Previous by thread: Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- Next by thread: Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- Index(es):
 |