* Christopher Warner ([email protected]) wrote: > 2.6.11.5 kernel, > Tyan S2882/dual AMD 246 opterons Got a time stamp by any chance (or a clue re: what was going on at the time)? thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Christopher Warner <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- References:
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Christopher Warner <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Christopher Warner <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.11 fix PROMISC/bridging in TLAN driver
- Next by Date: Re: Linux v2.6.12-rc4
- Previous by thread: Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- Next by thread: Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- Index(es):
 |