Hi!
> > I don't know, depends on what Jeff/James think of this approach. There
> > are many different way to solve this problem. I let the scsi bus called
> > suspend/resume for the devices on that bus, and let the scsi host
> > adapter perform any device dependent actions. The pci helpers are less
> > debatable.
> >
> > Jeff/James? Here's a patch that applies to current git.
>
> The patch looks fine as far as it goes ... however, shouldn't we be
> spinning *internal* suspended drives down as well like IDE does (i.e. at
> least the sd ULD needs to be a party to the suspend)? Of course this is
In IDE we do that to reliably flush drive caches... If write caching
actually works on SCSI, we should not need that hacks.
Pavel
--
Boycott Kodak -- for their patent abuse against Java.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
