On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 16:10 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I don't know, depends on what Jeff/James think of this approach. There
> are many different way to solve this problem. I let the scsi bus called
> suspend/resume for the devices on that bus, and let the scsi host
> adapter perform any device dependent actions. The pci helpers are less
> debatable.
>
> Jeff/James? Here's a patch that applies to current git.
The patch looks fine as far as it goes ... however, shouldn't we be
spinning *internal* suspended drives down as well like IDE does (i.e. at
least the sd ULD needs to be a party to the suspend)? Of course this is
a complete can of worms since we really have no idea which busses are
internal and which are external, although it might be something that
userland can determine.
James
P.S. I noticed the gratuitous coding style corrections ...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
