Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy

Dave Hansen wrote:

As an aside: is there a proper way to do patch text/plain attachments
from Evolution?  Maybe we need a quick tutorial on what the best way to
send patches is with several popular mailers.


I feel this is needed, yes.  Don't forget to include Microsoft Outlook :)

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy
  - From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy
  - From: [email protected]
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy
  - From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy
  - From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy
  - From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [patch 13/21] CKRM: Minor cosmetic cleanups in numtasks controller
Next by Date: Re: Mercurial v0.4d
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy
Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]