ons 2005-05-04 klockan 11:14 -0700 skrev Dave Hansen:
> On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 10:55 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> > I agree that things are better. But, ironically, this patch is a case
> > in point. It's attached as text/x-patch and makes replying to and
> > commenting on patch inline more laborious.
>
> Well, crap.
>
> I've sent an awful lot of patches that way, and never had a negative
> reply from a maintainer or a patch commenter.
>
> As an aside: is there a proper way to do patch text/plain attachments
> from Evolution? Maybe we need a quick tutorial on what the best way to
> send patches is with several popular mailers.
>
In evolution I just do new mail => insert => text file and change the
mail to preformat instead of normal formatting. I'm sure there are
settings somewhere to make this default but I don't send enough patches
(yet) to bother, the output works anyway (old patch shown below):
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86_64/kernel/head64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/head64.c 2005-04-26 11:41:43.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86_64/kernel/head64.c 2005-04-29 11:57:46.000000000 +0200
@@ -93,9 +93,6 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
cpu_set(0, cpu_online_map);
#endif
- /* default console: */
- if (!strstr(saved_command_line, "console="))
- strcat(saved_command_line, " console=tty0");
s = strstr(saved_command_line, "earlyprintk=");
if (s != NULL)
setup_early_printk(s);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
