On Wed, 4 May 2005, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
On Wed, 2005-05-04 13:10:35 -0400, Jon Smirl <[email protected]> wrote:
On 5/4/05, Dave Hansen <[email protected]> wrote:
I think the general opinion of posting patches as attachments
has changed over the last few years. Mailers have been getting
a lot better at handling them, even quoting non-message-body
plain/text attachments in replies.
There is also the problem of things like gmail/yahoo where you can't
control the word wrapping. The only way to submit patches from those
services is as an plain text attachment. If you try to submit then
in-line and they wrap wrong you will collect a lot of hate mail from
Andrew.
Well, why should someone use a broken mail service at all?
MfG, JBG
Because the net Nazis make often make it the only way to send/receive
mail in a domain. There is nothing coming or going here that doesn't
go through a M$ mail-killer that even saves every thread of evidence.
For instance, there is no signature on this file. I'll bet that
by the time you read it, there is one.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
