On Wed, 2005-05-04 13:10:35 -0400, Jon Smirl <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 5/4/05, Dave Hansen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I think the general opinion of posting patches as attachments
> > has changed over the last few years. Mailers have been getting
> > a lot better at handling them, even quoting non-message-body
> > plain/text attachments in replies.
>
> There is also the problem of things like gmail/yahoo where you can't
> control the word wrapping. The only way to submit patches from those
> services is as an plain text attachment. If you try to submit then
> in-line and they wrap wrong you will collect a lot of hate mail from
> Andrew.
Well, why should someone use a broken mail service at all?
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [email protected] . +49-172-7608481 _ O _
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O
fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
