Matt Mackall wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 03:16:26AM +0200, Bodo Eggert <[email protected]> wrote:
Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2005, Ryan Anderson wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 09:31:06AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
That said, I think the /usr/bin/env trick is stupid too. It may be more
portable for various Linux distributions, but if you want _true_
portability, you use /bin/sh, and you do something like
#!/bin/sh
exec perl perlscript.pl "$@"
if 0;
exec may fail.
#!/bin/sh
exec perl -x $0 ${1+"$@"} || exit 127
#!perl
You don't really want Perl to get itself into an exec loop.
This would _not_ be "perlscript.pl" itself. This is the shell-script, and
it's not called ".pl".
In this thread, it originally was.
In this thread, it was originally a Python script. In particular, one
aimed at managing the Linux kernel source. I'm going to use
/usr/bin/env, systems where that doesn't exist can edit the source.
On the theory that my first post got lost, why use /usr/bin/env at all,
when bash already does that substitution? To support people who use
other shells?
ie.:
FOO=xx perl -e '$a=$ENV{FOO}; print "$a\n"'
--
-bill davidsen ([email protected])
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
last possible moment - but no longer" -me
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]