Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matt Mackall wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 03:16:26AM +0200, Bodo Eggert <[email protected]> wrote:

Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote:

On Mon, 2 May 2005, Ryan Anderson wrote:

On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 09:31:06AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:

That said, I think the /usr/bin/env trick is stupid too. It may be more
portable for various Linux distributions, but if you want _true_
portability, you use /bin/sh, and you do something like

#!/bin/sh
exec perl perlscript.pl "$@"

if 0;

exec may fail.

#!/bin/sh
exec perl -x $0 ${1+"$@"} || exit 127
#!perl


You don't really want Perl to get itself into an exec loop.

This would _not_ be "perlscript.pl" itself. This is the shell-script, and
it's not called ".pl".

In this thread, it originally was.


In this thread, it was originally a Python script. In particular, one
aimed at managing the Linux kernel source. I'm going to use
/usr/bin/env, systems where that doesn't exist can edit the source.

On the theory that my first post got lost, why use /usr/bin/env at all, when bash already does that substitution? To support people who use other shells?

ie.:
   FOO=xx perl -e '$a=$ENV{FOO}; print "$a\n"'
--
   -bill davidsen ([email protected])
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
 last possible moment - but no longer"  -me
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux