On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 00:50 +0200, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> Andrew Morton <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> When __mod_timer() changes timer's base it waits for the completion
> >> of timer->function. It is just stupid: the caller of __mod_timer()
> >> can held locks which would prevent completion of the timer's
> >> handler.
> >>
> >> Solution: do not change the base of the currently running timer.
> >
> > OK, fingers crossed. Juergen, it would be great if you could test
> > Oleg's patch sometime.
>
> I had one more lockup yesterday but that probably was caused by
> something else because Azureus is running fine for 24 hours now.
Well, there may be other issues brought by this new timer code though.
I'm running G5s regulary without a lockup or anything for weeks, so it
would be interesting if you could try to find out what's involved in
that other lockup you had.
Ben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
