Re: [PATCH] fix __mod_timer vs __run_timers deadlock.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Morton <[email protected]> writes:

> Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> When __mod_timer() changes timer's base it waits for the completion
>> of timer->function. It is just stupid: the caller of __mod_timer()
>> can held locks which would prevent completion of the timer's
>> handler.
>>
>> Solution: do not change the base of the currently running timer.
>
> OK, fingers crossed.  Juergen, it would be great if you could test
> Oleg's patch sometime.

I had one more lockup yesterday but that probably was caused by
something else because Azureus is running fine for 24 hours now.

Thanks Oleg!


        Juergen

-- 
Juergen Kreileder, Blackdown Java-Linux Team
http://blog.blackdown.de/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux