On Sunday 01 May 2005 18:07, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 01:30:57PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > For now I've added an #ifdef to re-include that code for x86, while
> > excluding it for x86_64. Also, is that up-to-date wrt. 2.6.12-rc3?
>
> Yes, it is. As for the ptrace.c... IMO the right thing is
> per-architecture helper here. Such ifdefs are OK when it's just i386 and
> amd64. As soon as e.g. uml/s390 gets merged or uml/ia64 and uml/ppc get
> resurrected...
Agreed, I've done it this way to reintroduce for now the code for i386. It's
anyway kludgy, since amd64 has too its debug registers to handle (at least it
should); it's just that UML does not handle them yet.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
